Abstract
Abstract Abstract The classic wealth maximization modeling of forest landowners may not be useful when examining the behavior of family forest landowners in particular. My challenge to the forestry community is to think more broadly with respect to the economic modeling of management decisions by these landowners. I would propose that forest structure (e.g., trees per unit area versus diameter class/distribution) versus time, as opposed to volume versus time, is a superior and practical approach to model forest dynamics given these landowners’ well-published preferences. I would also propose that a cost-minimization/least-cost model is also more consistent with their well-published preferences. These proposals, however, are not without their advantages and disadvantages that are examined briefly. Nonetheless, my conclusions are that scholarship based on a least-cost approach could provide insights that the classical wealth maximization modeling may not, given landownership trends.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.