Ruminal digestion and glycosyl linkage patterns of cell wall components from leaf and stem fractions of alfalfa, orchardgrass, and wheat straw

Abstract

Samples of alfalfa, orchardgrass, and wheat straw were hand-separated into leaf and stem fractions that were subjected to in situ ruminal fermentation for various lengths of time to assess the rate and extent of degradation of cell wall neutral monosaccharides, uronic acids, acetyl groups, and hydroxycinnamic acids. A second objective was to measure the glycosyl linkage patterns of leaf and stem fractions of substrates before and after ruminal fermentation. Samples were fermented for 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, and 192 h in each of two ruminally cannulated steers. In situ disappearance data were fitted to a first-order exponential equation to estimate the following substrate parameters: insoluble, potentially digestible fraction (fd), indigestible fraction (fi), and fractional rate constant of degradation of the potentially digestible fraction (k). Leaves contained larger concentrations of crude protein and smaller concentrations of cell wall components than did stem fractions. Estimates of fi were 7.3, 39.2, 22.1, 49.3, 27.7, and 36.3 for dry matter disappearances for alfalfa leaf, alfalfa stem, orchardgrass leaf, orchardgrass stem, wheat straw leaf, and wheat straw stem, respectively. Averaged across substrates, estimates of fi for arabinose, galactose, glucose, xylose, uronic acids, acetyl groups, and p-coumaric acid were 16.5, 11.4, 14.8, 31.2, 12.8, 25.3, and 22.6% in leaf fractions and 29.5, 19.9, 37.5, 56.2, 35.0, 52.4, and 44.6% in stem fractions. Rates of digestion of all monomeric components except galactose and xylose were greater (P < .05) for alfalfa than for orchardgrass or wheat straw. Differences in digestibility of cell wall components from leaf and stem fractions were greater in alfalfa and orchardgrass than in wheat straw. Glycosyl linkage analysis indicated that xylans in leaf and stem fractions of alfalfa, orchardgrass leaf, and wheat straw stem that resisted degradation had a lower degree of substitution with acid-labile constituents (i.e., other monosaccharides) than was found in original substrates. Different rates and extents of digestion of leaf and stem fractions of forages explain part, but not all, of the observed differences in digestibilities of cell wall monomers by ruminants.