Abstract
When Searle's distinction between constitutive and regulative rules is applied to oracle consultation, we can see that some of the puzzlement Evans-Pritchard felt about Zande thoughtwhich he attributed to its mystical character-was unnecessary. Instead of drawing the analogy between Zande oracle consultation and western science, I suggest we should draw an analogy between Zande oracle consultation and games, because of the similarity between the kinds of rules that operate in these practices. This analogy reveals what kind of conventional activity Zande oracle consultation is and dissipates some puzzles Evans-Pritchard created out of his own misunderstanding of the nature of rules in this institution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
