Abstract

There are a number of ecogeographical “rules” that describe patterns of geographical variation among organisms. The island rule predicts that populations of larger mammals on islands evolve smaller mean body size than their mainland counterparts, whereas smaller‐bodied mammals evolve larger size. Bergmann's rule predicts that populations of a species in colder climates (generally at higher latitudes) have larger mean body sizes than conspecifics in warmer climates (at lower latitudes). These two rules are rarely tested together and neither has been rigorously tested in treeshrews, a clade of small‐bodied mammals in their own order (Scandentia) broadly distributed in mainland Southeast Asia and on islands throughout much of the Sunda Shelf. The common treeshrew, Tupaia glis, is an excellent candidate for study and was used to test these two rules simultaneously for the first time in treeshrews. This species is distributed on the Malay Peninsula and several offshore islands east, west, and south of the mainland. Using craniodental dimensions as a proxy for body size, we investigated how island size, distance from the mainland, and maximum sea depth between the mainland and the islands relate to body size of 13 insular T. glis populations while also controlling for latitude and correlation among variables. We found a strong negative effect of latitude on body size in the common treeshrew, indicating the inverse of Bergmann's rule. We did not detect any overall difference in body size between the island and mainland populations. However, there was an effect of island area and maximum sea depth on body size among island populations. Although there is a strong latitudinal effect on body size, neither Bergmann's rule nor the island rule applies to the common treeshrew. The results of our analyses demonstrate the necessity of assessing multiple variables simultaneously in studies of ecogeographical rules.

Highlights

  • Intraspecific geographical variation often presents vexing challenges to taxonomists, but such variation is essential for evolution and provides opportunities for insights into its underlying mechanisms

  • We used a hierarchical partitioning analysis to estimate the contribution of Latitude, Island Area, Distance to Mainland, and Sea Depth to the variance in PC1 because all of these factors were significantly correlated with each other

  • We further explored the effects of Latitude, Island Area, Distance to Mainland, and Sea Depth on variation in PC1 across the 13 island populations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intraspecific geographical variation often presents vexing challenges to taxonomists, but such variation is essential for evolution and provides opportunities for insights into its underlying mechanisms. Several environmental factors are known to drive geographical variation in morphology among mammals, including temperature gradients and isolation on islands or island-­like features (e.g., Millien et al, 2006). The magnitude of the effect of these factors on morphological variation may differ across species’ traits (e.g., Souto-­Lima & Millien, 2014; Teplitsky & Millien, 2013). This “rule” has been challenged, by several studies (Meiri, Dayan, & Simberloff, 2004, 2005, 2006) arguing that such size variation may vary among taxa (Meiri, Cooper, & Purvis, 2008)—applying, for example, to primates (Bromham & Cardillo, 2007; Welch, 2009) but not carnivorans (Meiri et al, 2004, 2005, 2006)—thereby challenging the notion that such “rules” are universal

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call