Abstract

Rule of law is the most uttered and cherished philosophy in present world as it is related to political democracy. [1] Each democratic or non-democratic regime reiterates her commitment for upholding rule of law in the process of governance. People of the developed and developing countries maintain a simple and honest belief that rule of law is truly practiced in the developed countries- USA, UK, France, etc. But reality is not so. Dicey innovated rule of law principle in 1885, when its total application was absent even in UK. Thereafter 1959 Delhi Declaration incorporated three more principles for making Dicey’s rule of law workable. Immediately after Delhi Declaration KC Davis clarified law for making it compatible with rule of law. Rule of law is not workable in a polluted society. Even in a democratic society rule of law is not fruitful if rationality, honesty and sincerity is not found in the action of the government and governed. If ethical values and personality integration are absent in the society rule of law can not achieve its goal. This rationality, honesty, ethical values are nothing but the outcome of secularized culture. Only secularized culture ensures rule of law in the society. State is considered as having secularized character. Secularism denotes to combination of rationality, moral and ethical values, and at last the dictate of right reason of a rational human being. State is emerged to protect and preserve the right to life, liberty and property of the people. But government, the trustee of the state, if not imbibed with this character, rule of law will not be visible in the society. Secularized character of government only expedites the journey of rule of law smooth, free and fruitful and, thereby making democracy and development meaningful. USA, UK and Western European countries are spokespersons of rule of law. Bangladesh and China also propagate rule of law and die for ensuring rule of law. In reality none of these states practice it. The reason lies in the non practice of secularized culture. This paper is intended to find out whether rule of law works without practice of secularized culture or not. Keywords : Rule of Law, Secularized Culture DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/109-10 Publication date: May 31 st 2021 [1] Shils Edward, Political Development in the New States, Mouton & Co., The Hague-Paris, 1966 pp.51-62

Highlights

  • The government of People’s Republic China is very much interested and enthusiastic in bringing about reforms in her judicial system with the object of ensuring rule of law for the common people.[2]

  • It is said that English Political System is based on rule of law

  • All the three prerequisites of rule of law declared in Delhi Declaration are available in Britain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The government of People’s Republic China is very much interested and enthusiastic in bringing about reforms in her judicial system with the object of ensuring rule of law for the common people.[2]. In a rotten society this concept is meaningless without the practice of secular culture by the ruler and ruled. 2. Rule of Law after A.V. Dicey: Rule of law is a political concept based on the teaching of A.V. Dicey. Implementation of this idea depends upon the political will of the people of concerned system. It is said that English Political System is based on rule of law. Until the passage of the Act of Ministerial Responsibility 1947 this innovation remained in paper not in practice. Dicey got this theory from the teaching of Chief Justice Cook and he just developed the idea in the following wards

Supremacy of law
Equality before law
Predominance of judicial decision
Shortcomings of Dicey’s Concept
Secularized Political Culture
Present Condition of Secularized Political Culture in UK
Condition of Secularized Political Culture in USA
Secularised Political Culture in Bangladesh
10. Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call