Abstract
AbstractAlumina and silica‐alumina supported Ru‐Pt catalysts were evaluated for the ring opening of naphthenes. Pt, Ru, and Ru‐Pt catalysts were prepared by the impregnation of inorganic precursors over γ‐alumina and silica‐alumina supports. The catalysts were evaluated by temperature programmed reduction (TPR), pyridine temperature programmed desorption (TPD), CO‐FTIR, and by test reactions of 33DM1B isomerization, cyclohexane dehydrogenation, cyclopentane hydrogenolysis, and the ring opening of decalin. The strong interaction between the metals (Pt‐Ru) was attributed to their reductions occurring simultaneously. The acidity and strength of the acid sites of the monometallic Ru catalyst were higher than those of the monometallic Pt catalyst. The total acidity (Lewis and Brønsted) and the strength of the acid sites were higher for the silica‐alumina supported catalysts. The silica‐alumina catalysts had 10 times more Brønsted acidity than the γ‐alumina ones and an increased activity and selectivity to decalin ring opening products. Supported monometallic Ru had the best performance for the ring opening reaction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
