Abstract
BackgroundAneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) are benign tumors mostly occurring in children and young adults. Different open and minimal invasive surgical approaches have been proposed for the treatment of ABCs and yet no consensus is defined to date. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review data of a large single center series of ABCs with patients treated by open curettage with or without filling of the cavity or en-bloc resection. Questions/purposesWe asked: (1) What was the local recurrence rate of ABC after surgical treatment at our institution? (2) What were positive or negative predictors for local recurrence? (3) Was there a benefit from adjuvant burring, phenolization or filling, respectively? (4) Where there changes in recurrence free survival in different time periods of primary surgery? MethodsBy retrospective data analysis of the Vienna Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry, 123 patients surgically treated for primary aneurysmal bone cysts were identified. After exclusion of 33 patients (27%) due to a postoperative follow up below one year, 90 patients who were treated for primary ABCs between 1986 and 2009 were evaluated. These included 50 males and 40 females with a mean age of 16 years (SD 10 years; range: 2 to 51 years). The mean follow-up was 99 months. (SD 72 months, range: 13 to 329 months) ResultsCurettage was performed in 84 patients, while 45 patients received adjuvant phenolization. Local recurrence occurred in 28 patients after a mean time of 16 months, with a corresponding local recurrence free survival (RFS) of 83% after one year, 77% after 2 years and 66% after 5 years. ABCs located in hands and feet (p=0.044) showed a superior RFS, while younger patients (p=0.001) displayed an inferior RFS. Regarding adjuvant surgical techniques, mechanical cavity burring (p=0.004) and filling with autologous cancellous bone graft (p=0.024) showed protective effects on RFS. Patients treated between 1986 and 1999 (n=47) had a higher RFS than patients treated between 2000 and 2009 (n=43, p=0.011), as surgeons and surgical indications changed over time. ConclusionAlthough curettage, burring, phenolization and reconstruction with bone grafts came with a relatively high risk of local recurrence, open surgery is still justified in aggressively growing ABCs of critical localizations. Level of EvidenceIV; therapeutic study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.