RSRM and ETM-03 Internal Flow Simulations and Comparisons

Abstract

ETM03 (Engineering Test Motor-03) is an extended length RSRM (Reusable Solid Rocket Motor) designed to increase motor performance and create more severe internal environments compared with the standard four-segment RSRM motor configuration. This is achieved primarily through three unique design features. First is the incorporation of an additional RSRM center segment, second is a slight increase in throat diameter, and third is the use of an Extended Aft Exit Cone (EAEC). As a result of these design features, parameters such as web time, action time, head end pressure, web time average pressure, maximum thrust, mass flow rate, centerline Mach number, pressure and thrust integrals have all increased compared with nominal RSRM values. In some cases these increases are substantial. The primary objective of the ETM03 test program is to provide a platform for RSRM component margin testing. Test results will not only provide direct data concerning component performance under more adverse conditions, but serve as a second design data point for developing, validating and enhancing component analytical modeling techniques. To help component designers assess how the changes in motor environment will affect performance, internal flow simulations for both the nominal RSRM and ETM03 motor designs were completed to obtain comparisons of aero-thermal boundary conditions and system loads. Full geometries for both motors were characterized with two-dimensional axi-symmetric models at burn times of 1, 20, 54, 67 and 80-seconds. A sixth set considered burn times of 110 and 117-seconds for RSRM and ETM03, respectively. The simulations were performed using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) commercial code FLUENT (trademark). Of particular interest were any differences between the two motor environments that could lead to a significant increase in system loads, or in internal insulation and/or nozzle component charring and erosion in ETM03 compared with RSRM. Based on these comparative analyses conducted in this study, the objective of ETM03 will be achieved by providing a more adverse operating environment for motor components than the nominal RSRM environment. For example: Higher chamber pressure drop in ETM03 than in RSRM; higher centerline Mach numbers approaching the nozzle in ETM03 than in RSRM; higher heat transfer rates for the internal insulation and nozzle components in ETM03 than in RSRM; and higher levels of droplet impingement and slag accumulation in ETM03 than in the RSRM.