Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the recent dismantling of the Union of South-American Nations (UNASUR) under the governments of the liberal-conservative turn recently experienced in South America. Through the mobilization of excerpts from speeches by Heads of State in the region, it is possible to note that the allegedly “ideological” character of UNASUR is presented as the main justification for leaving the institution. Having that in mind, the main objective of the article is to interrogate narratives about the ‘ideological’ character of UNASUL. For that, the article presents a literature review on regionalism, pragmatism and ideology to challenge this narrative. It is argued, first, that pragmatism and ideology in regionalism are not dichotomous, but complementary concepts. Moreover, despite UNASUR’s ideological elements, the organization represents a series of alignments and pragmatic factors in its institutionalization and performance. Finally, it is argued that the proposals for “de-ideologization” and “pragmatic realignment” of the regionalism of the new rights in South America are, in fact, more ideological than pragmatic as they claim.

Highlights

  • No presente artigo, temos o objetivo de apresentar uma análise sobre o recente desmantelamento da União das Nações Sul-Americanas (UNASUL), uma das mais proeminentes iniciativas do chamado regionalismo “pós-hegemônico” ou “pós-liberal” na América do Sul (BRICEÑO RUIZ; RIBEIRO HOFFMANN, 2015; SANAHUJA, 2009)

  • The article presents an analysis of the recent dismantling of the Union of South-American Nations (UNASUR) under the governments of the liberal-conservative turn recently experienced in South America

  • Through the mobilization of excerpts from speeches by Heads of State in the region, it is possible to note that the allegedly “ideological” character of UNASUR is presented as the main justification for leaving the institution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Temos o objetivo de apresentar uma análise sobre o recente desmantelamento da União das Nações Sul-Americanas (UNASUL), uma das mais proeminentes iniciativas do chamado regionalismo “pós-hegemônico” ou “pós-liberal” na América do Sul (BRICEÑO RUIZ; RIBEIRO HOFFMANN, 2015; SANAHUJA, 2009). Mesmo em termo das políticas externas individuais dos Estados-membros, Gian Luca Gardini (2011b) nota que, em que pese as posturas inevitavelmente ideológicas da UNASUL, havia interesses e oportunidades bastante pragmáticos em jogo: Com a UNASUL, o Brasil tem acesso a mais mercados, suprimento energético e acesso ao Pacífico, bem como a consolidação de uma plataforma para apoiar suas aspirações globais.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.