Row spacing and irrigation management affect soybean yield, water use efficiency and economics

Abstract

Declining water levels in the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer necessitates research on the management practices that can reduce irrigation water use and improve irrigation water use efficiency. A three-year field study from 2019 to 2021 evaluated the effects of row spacing and irrigation management on soybean seed yield and quality, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), water productivity (WP), and profitability. Soybean was planted in two row spacings [single- (SR) and twin-row (TR)] and irrigated with three different methods [every row irrigated (ERI), alternate row irrigated (ARI), non-irrigated (NI)]. Soybean yields were increased with application of irrigation either as ERI or ARI as compared to NI in all three years ranging from 20% to 79%. The ERI had 20% increase in yield over ARI in 2021, whereas no significant differences were found between ERI and ARI in 2019 and 2020. Averaged over row spacing, IWUE was 66–91% greater with ARI compared to ERI. Only 2021 showed an increase (34%) in WP with irrigation applied as ARI than NI. Differences in rainfall amount among years and amount of irrigation applied under different treatments affected the soybean yields. Soybean yield showed reduction by 0.37–1.2 kg ha−1 with each unit increase in cumulative stress (kPa-days) for soil moisture potential drier than the −40 kPa on very fine sandy loam soils. Twin-row soybean had higher expected returns in all cases except for the NI and ERI in 2021. The TR soybean produced the greatest average risk-return than other treatments. The ARI with TR had the second highest overall risk-return trade-off. The ARI resulted in an equivalent risk-return production system as ERI for SR soybeans. Alterations in furrow irrigation methods could be more beneficial than row spacing to improve soybean productivity and IWUE.