Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or hepaticoduodenostomy for biliary reconstruction after resection of congenital biliary dilatation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

The ideal surgical management for reconstruction after excision of congenital biliary dilatation remains controversial. This updated meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) and hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) after resection of congenital biliary dilatation. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from November 1981 through July 2020. The primary outcomes were the operative time, enteral feeding time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Thirteen total studies included 518 (55.76%) HD cases and 411 (44.24%) HJ cases. Five studies were published post-2013; one was a randomized clinical trial. Patients undergoing HD had a shorter hospital stay (MD, 0.40; p = 0.02) and operative time (MD, 59.54; p < 0.00001) and a lower incidence of adhesive intestinal obstruction (OR, 0.20; p = 0.02) than HJ. HD was comparable to conventional HJ with regard to most postoperative outcomes; however, it was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative bilious gastritis (OR, 6.24; p = 0.002). HD is as safe and feasible as HJ with better outcomes in the short run, although reports with long-term follow-up are relatively few. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to monitor possible associated malignancies in the future.