Abstract
ObjectivesFluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) is typically considered to have minimal yield in gastric cancer, and so is not consistently recommended by international guidelines. However, its yield is considerable in esophageal and junctional cancer, identifying unsuspected metastases and risk-stratifying patients using metabolic nodal stage (mN). We aimed to determine the contemporary utility of routine 18F-FDG PET-CT in gastric cancer.MethodsWe routinely stage patients with non-junctional gastric cancer with PET-CT, provided initial CT does not demonstrate unequivocal metastases. We performed a retrospective study of all such patients staged in our institution from January 2007 to July 2016. Our primary endpoint was detection of incurable disease. Our secondary endpoint was disease-free survival following gastrectomy. Decision theory, economic, and predictive models were generated.ResultsThe primary tumor was FDG-avid in 225/279 patients (80.6%). Seventy-two (25.8%) had FDG-avid nodes (resectable by D2 lymphadenectomy). This was not influenced by the Lauren classification. Unsuspected metastases were identified in 20 patients (7.2%). In 13 (4.7%), these would not have been otherwise identified. Decision theory and economic modeling supported routine PET-CT. Patients with FDG-avid nodes were more likely to have incurable disease (51.4% versus 15.5%; p < 0.001), and a worse prognosis if not: multivariate hazard ratio 2.19 (1.23–3.91; p = 0.008). Prognosis worsened with mN stage.ConclusionsPET-CT appears useful when used routinely for non-junctional gastric cancer, and should be considered in international recommendations. Any extra costs appear small and offset by avoiding futile investigations and radical treatment. mN stage identifies patients at risk of early recurrence and death.Key Points• PET-CT is typically not considered useful when staging gastric cancer. We describe a retrospective study of 279 patients routinely staged with PET-CT in the absence of metastases on CT.• The primary tumor was avid in 80% of patients. Twenty-five percent had resectable avid nodes. PET-CT identified previously unsuspected metastases in 7% of patients, which would likely not have been identified by conventional staging without PET-CT in 5%. These patients were much more likely to have avid nodes.• Beyond avoiding futile investigations and radical treatment in this 5%, we found patients with FDG-avid nodes (metabolic nodal stage, mN) to have a worse disease-free survival after gastrectomy.
Highlights
The contemporary utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PETCT) in gastric cancer is unclear
We describe a retrospective study of 279 patients routinely staged with positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) in the absence of metastases on CT
We found that routinely staging all patients with gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT was useful, both identifying unsuspected metastases and risk-stratifying patients
Summary
The contemporary utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PETCT) in gastric cancer is unclear. While in esophageal and gastro-esophageal junctional (GOJ) cancer it has clear utility in identifying metastases [1, 2], experience in gastric cancer is limited to two small studies of locally advanced disease from Korea and America. This lack of experience is perhaps due to initial reports that gastric cancer ( the diffuse subtype) is frequently not avid [3]. We found that patients with FDG-avid nodes within a standard lymphadenectomy field had a higher risk of disease progression before surgery and recurrence and death afterwards [5–7] Whether this is true in gastric cancer is unclear, previously assessed by just two studies of Korean and Chinese populations [8, 9]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.