Routine Office Assessment After OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection for Overactive Bladder Is Unnecessary to Detect Clinically Significant Voiding Dysfunction.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if routine assessment of patients after onabotulinumtoxinA injections for overactive bladder is necessary to detect clinically significant voiding dysfunction. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study analyzed patients who underwent intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder during a 4-year period. Patients were included for analysis if they returned for an office follow-up visit within 1 month of administration. Baseline demographic data; procedural details; postvoid residual volumes; abnormal postprocedure voiding symptoms, including urinary frequency, pain, or inability to void; urinary tract infections; and initiation of intermittent self-catheterization were recorded. Descriptive statistics, point-biserial and Pearson correlation analyses were performed. Two hundred thirty-seven injections were included in our analysis. Fifteen encounters, from 13 patients, required the initiation of intermittent self-catheterization (6.3%). The median postvoid residual in those treated with intermittent self-catheterization was 300 mL (min, max: 200, 750 mL); all had received 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA. The most common symptom among those requiring intermittent self-catheterization was urgency (n = 13; 87%), whereas 93% (n = 14) had at least 1 bothersome symptom. Correlation analyses showed a weak positive correlation with elevated postvoid residual volume and a history of prolapse repair (r = 0.269, P = 0.004), and prior pelvic surgery (r = 0.205, P = 0.029). Clinically relevant urinary retention that required intermittent self-catheterization after onabotulinumtoxinA injection for overactive bladder occurred in 6.3% of participants in this sample. The vast majority of patients who required intermittent self-catheterization described symptoms that they were able to self-identify.