Abstract

ABSTRACTMost of existing rough boundary treatment methods for the shear-stress transport model require much finer grids than smooth boundary treatment methods. Knopp, Eisfeld, and Calvo (2009, A new extension for k–ω turbulence models to account for wall roughness. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30(1), 54–65.) developed a rough boundary treatment method that allows the same grid resolution as smooth boundary treatment methods, but its effect of grid resolution on the computed velocity is strong. This study aims to improve the method of Knopp et al. (2009, A new extension for k–ω turbulence models to account for wall roughness. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30(1), 54–65.) and to reduce the effect of grid resolution. This work newly incorporates the effect of grid resolution on boundary values of , the inverse time scale. The method generates the logarithmic velocity profile of open channel flows over rough beds with a velocity shift relative to that over smooth beds. The computed velocity shift, depending on the dimensionless roughness, generally agrees with the measured ones. The effect of the grid resolution on velocity shift that is computed using the present method is only 31% of that using the method of Knopp et al. (2009, A new extension for k–ω turbulence models to account for wall roughness. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30(1), 54–65.) in the transitionally rough regime. The effect of grid resolution in the transitionally rough regime is stronger than in both the hydraulically smooth regime and the fully rough regime. The present method is applied to simulate open channel flow over a bed with suddenly changing roughness. The computed velocities are consistent with the measured ones. The method reveals a sharp response of the shear velocity to the sudden change in roughness.

Highlights

  • Roughness elements on surfaces disturb flow and change near-bed turbulence characteristics (Flack & Schultz, 2014; Schultz & Flack, 2007)

  • This study aims to improve the method of Knopp et al

  • The effect of the grid resolution on velocity shift that is computed using the present method is only 31% of that using the method of Knopp et al

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Roughness elements on surfaces disturb flow and change near-bed turbulence characteristics (Flack & Schultz, 2014; Schultz & Flack, 2007). In the hydraulically smooth regime, the flow disturbance that is induced by roughness elements is damped out by viscosity, so the roughness elements do not significantly affect the flow. In this regime, the flow structure over a rough surface is, identical to that over a smooth surface. The flow comprises three layers near surface, which are, in order of increasing distance from the wall, (1) a viscous sublayer in which viscous effects dominates, (2) a buffer layer in which both viscosity and turbulence are important and which is responsible for generating turbulent energy (Robinson, 1991), and (3) a log-law layer in which turbulence dominates and the flow has a logarithmic velocity profile.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.