Rotational thromboelastometry parameters as predicting factors for bleeding in immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Abstract

Objective/BackgroundPatients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) often present with a severe reduction in platelet counts and suffer from an increased risk of bleeding. However, platelet counts do not accurately predict bleeding risk in these patients. MethodsWe thereby conducted a case series prospective study to compare the ability to predict hemorrhage in ITP patients between platelet counts and various rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters. ResultsThe inclusion criteria for patients diagnosed with acute, persistent, and chronic ITP were platelet counts of <30 × 109/L and no clinically significant bleeding (grade ≥ 2 according to the WHO Bleeding Scale) at the beginning of the study. After 24 hours of follow-up, of the 45 enrolled patients, 14 (31.1%) experienced clinically significant bleeding. The mean platelet counts of patients with and without clinically significant bleeding were not statistically different (p = .09). However, the mean EXTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF), EXTEM A10, EXTEM area under the curve (AUC), and platelet maximum clot elasticity (MCE) values of the two groups were statistically different (p < .05). There was also a significant difference in IPF values between these two groups (p < .05.) ConclusionResults obtained from this preliminary study demonstrate that ROTEM parameters might be useful in predicting factors for hemorrhage in ITP patients. Future studies with a larger sample size is warranted to confirm our findings, which will allow prompt and effective bleeding management in ITP patients.