Abstract

Abstract The dynamic stability of a rotary‐wing aircraft is assessed by predicting and observing the aircraft motion following a disturbance from trimmed flight. Varying time scales for the dynamic stability assessment separate the stability modes. A short time scale of 2–3 s highlights the control response. A longer time scale up to a maximum of typically 60 s describes the “classical” dynamic stability. For a conventional helicopter, the effects of the main rotor dominate the control response and dynamic stability characteristics, although other key contributions must be considered. These contributions can be quantified via stability and control derivative sets enabling estimates of engineering parameters. Comparisons can be made of these parameters against handling quality metrics to predict handling quality rating (HQR) levels. Flight testing involving longitudinal and lateral‐directional control response tests and dynamic stability tests are relatively straightforward but will always be supported by mission‐related handling tasks, where HQR values are assigned by qualified test pilots. Cross‐coupling assessments are a significant feature of control response and dynamic stability testing. The principles and practices of dynamic stability modeling and flight testing have applications to unconventional rotary‐wing configurations but only after cautious appraisal of the likely outcomes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.