Abstract

One of the fields of interest of modern political science involves the process of transformation of political systems, understood as the transition from nondemocratic to democratic systems. One of the countries undergoing such a political transformation is the Russian Federation, which in the nineteen-nineties faced the need to reject the model of the socio-political system of the Soviet Union, and to adjust to the emerging global civilization dominated by the models originating in West European countries. The paper emphasizes that, on account of the difficulties related to the process of political transformation, at the beginning of the new millennium West European models began to be supplanted by the models of Asian countries enjoying impressive economic growth while maintaining paternalist and authoritarian mechanisms of power. The author of the paper stresses that the political system of the modern Russian Federation is a particular mix of European and Asian models. Its functioning does not resemble the political regimes of polyarchy as much as those described as ‘Asian democracies’. The author indicates that given the present developmental stage of the Russian Federation, this models appears to be more practical and adequate in the political and cultural reality of modern Russia.

Highlights

  • Uniwersytet GdañskiRosja w poszukiwaniu modelu re¿imu politycznego – „poliarchia zachodnia” czy „azjatycka demokracja”

  • One of the fields of interest of modern political science involves the process of transformation of political systems, understood as the transition from nondemocratic to democratic systems

  • One of the countries undergoing such a political transformation is the Russian Federation, which in the nineteen-nineties faced the need to reject the model of the socio-political system of the Soviet Union, and to adjust to the emerging global civilization dominated by the models originating in West European countries

Read more

Summary

Uniwersytet Gdañski

Rosja w poszukiwaniu modelu re¿imu politycznego – „poliarchia zachodnia” czy „azjatycka demokracja”. Jednym z podstawowych obszarów zainteresowañ nauk politycznych jest klasyfikacja ró¿nych form rz1dzenia. Jak pisa[3] Andrzej Antoszewski, nauka o systemach politycznych stanowi wa¿ny, jeœli nie wiod1cy segment politologii. Kto i w jaki sposób uzyskuje dostêp do w3adzy pañstwowej, jak przebiega proces podejmowania wi1¿1cych cz3onków danej zbiorowoœci decyzji, jakie s1 prawne i faktyczne mo¿liwoœci ich kwestionowania oraz na jakich zasadach ponoszona jest odpowiedzialnoœæ rz1dz1cych – to g3ówne zadania nauki o systemach politycznych, koncentruj1cej siê na opisie i wyjaœnianiu powtarzalnych wzorców zachowañ politycznych i instytucjonalnych ram, które je wyznaczaj[11]. Znacz1cym problemem w badaniach nad systemami politycznymi jest fakt, i¿ organizacje polityczne (pañstwa) ró¿ni[1] siê znacznie pod wzglêdem organizacji i pojmowania roli w3adzy. Jak pisa[3] Andrew Heywood przy analizie i klasyfikowaniu systemów politycznych do najczêœciej stosowanych parametrów zalicza siê: 1) Kto rz1dzi? Antoszewski, Metodologiczne aspekty badañ nad wspó3czesnymi systemami politycznymi, „Studia Nauk Politycznych”, nr 1, styczeñ 2004, s. 79

Jakub Potulski
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call