Abstract
While it is clearly ridiculous to judge a book by its cover, the title as a signpost does offer a realistic description of the book. Aris is indeed concerned with trade unions and their management of conflict—the use of the ideologically loaded term in this context being well chosen. Less immediate are other parameters of the work: It concerns Great Britain, the state's management of conflict, and the period 1910–1921. The validity of these parameters is partially explained and partially assumed, but I think those within the field of labor history will recognize them as an acceptable balance between scope and length. The work does not seek to serve any particular sectional interests and their relationships with trade unions. I found the focus acceptable, indeed warranted, and Aris develops a useful (if not flawless) contribution to the literature.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.