Abstract
SummaryThe dependence between flowering cycles and woody stem parts of a rose crop was studied, with respect to plant architecture and carbohydrate content. Two harvesting methods (“control” versus “flush”) and two plant types (“control” versus “one stemmed”) were compared. Crop growth and partitioning of dry matter were studied as influenced by crop management during 18 months of culture. For a full-productive year, flush harvesting generally promoted bud break as compared with continuous harvesting but at the same time, also due to lower light interception, blind-shoot formation was enhanced and the individual flower weight reduced. Numbers of basal shoots were hardly related to flower production over a full cropping year. Flower production was much more sensitive to the number and diameter of branches at the height of cutting the flowers. The treatments did not affect carbohydrate allocation in the plant. Total carbohydrate storage was much too low to argue a clear role for the possible use of movement...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have