Rose bengal and iodopyracet as radiodiagnostic agents in liver and kidney diseases.

Abstract

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 78, Issue 3 p. 872-893 ROSE BENGAL AND IODOPYRACET AS RADIODIAGNOSTIC AGENTS IN LIVER AND KIDNEY DISEASES* G. V. Taplin, G. V. Taplin Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this authorO. M. Meredith Jr., O. M. Meredith Jr. Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this authorC. C. Winter, C. C. Winter Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this authorD. Johnson, D. Johnson Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this author G. V. Taplin, G. V. Taplin Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this authorO. M. Meredith Jr., O. M. Meredith Jr. Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this authorC. C. Winter, C. C. Winter Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this authorD. Johnson, D. Johnson Nuclear Radiology Division, Department and Laboratories of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Biology, and the Departments of Medicine, Radiology, and Urology, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles; Urological Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; and the Radiological Service of the Los Angeles County Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif.Search for more papers by this author First published: July 1959 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb56071.xCitations: 6 † *The investigations reported here were supported by Contract AT(04-1)-GEN-12 between the Atomic Energy Commission and the University of California a t Los Angeles. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume78, Issue3Radiopaque Diagnostic AgentsJuly 1959Pages 872-893 RelatedInformation