Abstract
The Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) may possess distinct advantages as a tool for identifying leaders but current research is inadequate to support its validity in organizational contexts. To strengthen this empirical foundation, the present study used confidence interval analyses to compare data for 30 college student leaders to samples of nonpatients and college students on the following CS scales: emotionally based resources (SumC), introspective tendencies (FD), capacity for collaboration (COP), stimulus integration (DQ+), and perceptual accuracy (X+%). Results indicated that student leaders produced higher scores on SumC, COP, and FD but not DQ+ or X+%. The implications of these findings are discussed and guidelines for advancing research in this area are proposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
