Abstract
Increasing urbanisation has led to a greater use of artificial structures by bats as alternative roost sites. Despite the widespread presence of bats, roost availability may restrict their distribution and abundance in urban environments. There is limited quantitative information on the drivers of bat roost selection and roosting preferences, particularly in African bats. We explore the factors influencing roost selection in the Mauritian tomb bat (Taphozous mauritianus), within an urban landscape in Lilongwe city, Malawi. Eight building and five landscape features of roosts were compared with both adjacent and random control buildings throughout the city. Bat occupied buildings were situated closer to woodland (mean 709m) compared to random buildings (mean 1847m) but did not differ in any other landscape features explored. Roosts were situated on buildings with larger areas and taller walls, suggesting bats select features for predator-avoidance and acoustic perception when leaving the roost. Bats preferred buildings with exposed roof beams which may provide refuge from disturbance. Whilst roosts are situated more often on brick walls, this feature was also associated with landscape features, therefore its importance in roost selection is less clear. These results are indicative that T. mauritianus selects roosts at both the building and landscape level. The selectivity of T. mauritianus in relation to its roost sites implies that preferred roosts are a limited resource, and as such, conservation actions should focus on protecting roost sites and the woodland bats rely on.
Highlights
Urban areas are expanding at an unprecedented rate, causing significant reductions in biodiversity and ecosystem service provision [1]
Distance to woodland Distance to woodland + building density (0.5 km)a + building density (1500m)a Distance to woodland + distance to watera + road density (0.5 km)a + building density (0.5 km)a Distance to woodland + woodland areaa Distance to woodland + road densitya Distance to woodland + distance to watera + density of buildings (0.5 km)a Distance to woodland + density of buildings (0.5 km)a Distance to woodland + distance to watera + road densitya + building density (500m)a + building density (1.0–1.5 km)a Distance to woodland + distance to watera + building density (500m)a + building density (1.0–1.5 km)a Distance to woodland + building density (1.0–1.5 km)a Distance to woodland + distance to watera
Our results demonstrate patterns of non-random association between T. mauritianus and building and landscape features which is indicative of roost selection
Summary
Urban areas are expanding at an unprecedented rate, causing significant reductions in biodiversity and ecosystem service provision [1]. Urban roosting ecology of Mauritian tomb bat projected to live in cities by 2050, an increase of 13% from 2018 estimates [2]. Factors threatening bat populations include habitat loss and fragmentation, roost disturbance, agriculture, hunting, persecution, non-native predators, urban development, climate change, and the emergence of diseases such as white-nose syndrome in North America [3,4,5,6]. Roosts often play a significant part in shaping and maintaining social interactions [9, 10] and the type and location of available roosts is likely to play a decisive role in determining bat survival and fitness [11]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.