Abstract

Translesion synthesis (TLS) provides a highly conserved mechanism that enables DNA synthesis on a damaged template. TLS is performed by specialized DNA polymerases of which polymerase (Pol) κ is important for the cellular response to DNA damage induced by benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE), ultraviolet (UV) light and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). As TLS polymerases are intrinsically error-prone, tight regulation of their activity is required. One level of control is provided by ubiquitination of the homotrimeric DNA clamp PCNA at lysine residue 164 (PCNA-Ub). We here show that Polκ can function independently of PCNA modification and that Polη can function as a backup during TLS of MMS-induced lesions. Compared to cell lines deficient for PCNA modification (PcnaK164R) or Polκ, double mutant cell lines display hypersensitivity to MMS but not to BPDE or UV-C. Double mutant cells also displayed delayed post-replicative TLS, accumulate higher levels of replication stress and delayed S-phase progression. Furthermore, we show that Polη and Polκ are redundant in the DNA damage bypass of MMS-induced DNA damage. Taken together, we provide evidence for PCNA-Ub-independent activation of Polκ and establish Polη as an important backup polymerase in the absence of Polκ in response to MMS-induced DNA damage.

Highlights

  • Translesion synthesis (TLS) is an evolutionary conserved DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathway that enables cells to cope with replication-blocking DNA lesions [1]

  • Having established a unique set of mammalian cell lines with defined deficiencies in DDT, we here investigated the dependence of Pol␬ on PCNA-Ub in the cellular response to various DNA damaging agents

  • We investigated the role of Pol␩, Pol␬ and PCNA-Ub in coordinating the timing of TLS, i.e. on the fly and post-replicative DNA damage bypass

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Translesion synthesis (TLS) is an evolutionary conserved DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathway that enables cells to cope with replication-blocking DNA lesions [1]. TLS depends on specialized DNA polymerases that are able to accommodate bulky DNA lesions as well as non-Watson–Crick base paring in their flexible active sites [2]. These enzymes lack the 3 to 5 exonuclease activity associated with the proofreading ability of replicative polymerases. Together, these characteristics render TLS polymerases intrinsically error-prone in replicating across DNA lesions. Recent evidence suggested that, depending on the polymerase and the lesion, TLS could occur directly at the replication fork, called ‘on the fly’ [9,10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.