Abstract

Does the nature of representation in the category-selective regions in the occipitotemporal cortex reflect visual or conceptual properties? Previous research showed that natural variability in visual features across categories, quantified by image gist statistics, is highly correlated with the different neural responses observed in the occipitotemporal cortex. Using fMRI, we examined whether category selectivity for animals and tools would remain, when image gist statistics were comparable across categories. Critically, we investigated how category, shape, and spatial frequency may contribute to the category selectivity in the animal- and tool-selective regions. Female and male human observers viewed low- or high-passed images of round or elongated animals and tools that shared comparable gist statistics in the main experiment, and animal and tool images of naturally varied gist statistics in a separate localizer. Univariate analysis revealed robust category-selective responses for images with comparable gist statistics across categories. Successful classification for category (animals/tools), shape (round/elongated), and spatial frequency (low/high) was also observed, with highest classification accuracy for category. Representational similarity analyses further revealed that the activation patterns in the animal-selective regions were most correlated with a model that represents only animal information, whereas the activation patterns in the tool-selective regions were most correlated with a model that represents only tool information, suggesting that these regions selectively represent information of only animals or tools. Together, in addition to visual features, the distinction between animal and tool representations in the occipitotemporal cortex is likely shaped by higher-level conceptual influences such as categorization or interpretation of visual inputs.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Since different categories often vary systematically in both visual and conceptual features, it remains unclear what kinds of information determine category-selective responses in the occipitotemporal cortex. To minimize the influences of low- and mid-level visual features, here we used a diverse image set of animals and tools that shared comparable gist statistics. We manipulated category (animals/tools), shape (round/elongated), and spatial frequency (low/high), and found that the representational content of the animal- and tool-selective regions is primarily determined by their preferred categories only, regardless of shape or spatial frequency. Our results show that category-selective responses in the occipitotemporal cortex are influenced by higher-level processing such as categorization or interpretation of visual inputs, and highlight the specificity in these category-selective regions.

Highlights

  • As the human brain transforms visual inputs into conceptual representations, the occipitotemporal cortex is a potential locus where such transformation may occur (Carlson et al, 2014; Clarke and Tyler, 2014, 2015)

  • The visibility of the LSF and HSF images were comparable in the pilot study, a 2 Â 2 Â 2 ANOVA conducted on accuracy and response time (RT) in the one-back task in the scanner revealed a significant effect of Spatial Frequency (accuracy: F(1,19) = 4.52, p = 0.047; RT: F(1,19) = 25.26, p = 0.0001), with better and faster performance for LSF than HSF images

  • Univariate results regions of interest (ROIs) analysis To examine whether category selectivity is observed for images with comparable gist statistics across categories, and whether the category-selective regions respond differentially for different shapes and spatial frequencies, a 2 Â 2 Â 2 ANOVA with the within-subjects factors Category, Shape, and SF (LSF vs HSF) was conducted on the amplitude of neural responses in each ROI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the human brain transforms visual inputs into conceptual representations, the occipitotemporal cortex is a potential locus where such transformation may occur (Carlson et al, 2014; Clarke and Tyler, 2014, 2015). While category-selective regions for animals and tools in the occipitotemporal cortex have been widely documented (Chao et al, 1999; Downing et al, 2006; Gerlach, 2007; Martin, 2007; Kriegeskorte et al, 2008; Mahon and Caramazza, 2009; Mur et al, 2012; Proklova et al, 2016), the nature of the representations in these regions remains controversial It remains unresolved regarding the following: (1) the extent that these regions represent visual or conceptual information, as visual and conceptual differences among categories often covary. We first used univariate analysis to examine the response magnitudes in these regions among the categories, shapes, and spatial frequencies

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.