Abstract

The present study tested the hypothesis that several residues in Loop 2 of alpha1 glycine receptors (GlyRs) play important roles in mediating the transduction of agonist activation to channel gating. This was accomplished by investigating the effect of cysteine point mutations at positions 50-60 on glycine responses in alpha1GlyRs using two-electrode voltage clamp of Xenopus oocytes. Cysteine substitutions produced position-specific changes in glycine sensitivity that were consistent with a beta-turn structure of Loop 2, with odd-numbered residues in the beta-turn interacting with other agonist-activation elements at the interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains. We also tested the hypothesis that the charge at position 53 is important for agonist activation by measuring the glycine response of wild type (WT) and E53C GlyRs exposed to methanethiosulfonate reagents. As earlier, E53C GlyRs have a significantly higher EC(50) than WT GlyRs. Exposing E53C GlyRs to the negatively charged 2-sulfonatoethyl methanethiosulfonate, but not neutral 2-hydroxyethyl methanethiosulfonate, positively charged 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate, or 2-trimethylammonioethyl methanethiosulfonate, decreased the glycine EC(50) to resemble WT GlyR responses. Exposure to these reagents did not significantly alter the glycine EC(50) for WT GlyRs. The latter findings suggest that the negative charge at position 53 is important for activation of GlyRs through its interaction with positive charge(s) in other neighboring agonist activation elements. Collectively, the findings provide the basis for a refined molecular model of alpha1GlyRs based on the recent x-ray structure of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel and offer insight into the structure-function relationships in GlyRs and possibly other ligand-gated ion channels.

Highlights

  • The glycine EC50 and Hill slope for WT GlyRs exposed to MTSEA, MTSEH, MTSES, and MTSET did not significantly differ from WT GlyRs that were not exposed to an MTS reagent

  • The current study systematically investigated the role that Loop 2 residues play in agonist activation of ␣1GlyRs

  • The findings build upon previous work (10, 13–16) and add new evidence that multiple residues within Loop 2 are important for GlyR agonist activation

Read more

Summary

The abbreviations used are

GlyR, glycine receptor; AChBP, acetylcholine-binding protein; GABAA, ␥-aminobutyric acid type A; GABAAR, ␥-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; LGIC, ligand-gated ion channel; MTSEA, 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate; MTSEH, 2-hydroxyethyl methanethiosulfonate; MTSES, 2-sulfonatoethyl methanethiosulfonate; MTSET, 2-trimethylammonioethyl methanethiosulfonate; nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; WT, wild type; TM, transmembrane; MTS, methanethiosulfonate. The location of Loop 2 in the extracellular oval chamber suggests that Loop 2 may influence chloride ion movement prior to entering the TM segment of the pore This suggestion is supported by Brownian dynamics simulations, which revealed that the charged residues in and near Loop 2 create an energy barrier to chloride ion movement (18). We further tested the hypothesis by investigating the effect of charge in Loop 2 by binding methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents with different charges to cysteine substitutions at position 53 in Loop 2 (Glu53)

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call