Roles for CCN proteins in Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine 1‐Phosphate Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells

Abstract

IntroductionCysteine rich angiogenic factor (CCN1/Cyr61) and connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF) are members of the CCN family of matricellular proteins. These secreted proteins interact with extracellular matrix proteins and integrins to modulate cell signaling. CCN proteins have been implicated in survival and other mitogenic responses in various cancers. CCN1 and CCN2 are the two early inducible genes in this family. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) are lipid growth factors known to contribute to tumor progression in prostate cancer. In previous work, our group showed that LPA stimulates proliferation and migration in prostate cancer cells via the G protein‐coupled receptor LPAR1. Free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4) agonists, inhibit LPA‐induced responses in prostate cancer cells. We also demonstrated that CCN1 expression is induced by LPA in human prostate cancer cells. However, the roles of CCN1 and CCN2 in cancer cell signaling have not been fully elucidated.HypothesisWe hypothesize that CCN proteins contribute to LPA‐ and S1P‐induced adhesion and mitogenic signaling in prostate cancer cells.Methods and ResultsPC‐3 human prostate cancer cells were used in the current study. For all experiments, cells were serum starved for 24 hours and then treated with and without 10 µM LPA or S1P. Immunoblotting showed that CCN1 and CCN2 were induced by LPA after 2‐5 hours in PC‐3 cells. The response was inhibited by the LPA receptor antagonist Ki1625. TUG‐891, an FFAR4 agonist, inhibited LPA‐induced CCN1 expression in PC‐3 cells. S1P also induced CCN1 expression in PC‐3 cells. In related experiments, whole cell extracts, and extracellular matrix were subjected to immunoblotting for CCN1, and immunofluorescence microscopy was used to localize the induced CCN1. CCN1 protein levels in extracellular matrix were increased 2‐5 hours after LPA treatment, as compared to untreated controls, and CCN1 was detected outside the cells by confocal microscopy. In cell adhesion assays, LPA‐treated PC‐3 cells exhibited an increase in adhesion to fibronectin‐coated 96‐well plates that was detected by 2 hours. Erk MAPK activation in response to LPA was biphasic, with the later phase occurring after CCN1/2 induction.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that CCN proteins may play roles in LPA‐ and S1P‐induced signaling in prostate cancer cells and are thus potential therapeutic targets.