Role Perceptions and Behavior in Three U.S. Courts of Appeals

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesRole Perceptions and Behavior in Three U.S. Courts of AppealsJ. Woodford Howard, Jr.J. Woodford Howard, Jr. Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 39, Number 4Nov., 1977 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2129935 Views: 21Total views on this site Citations: 31Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1977 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Tomas Aquino Guimarães, Adalmir Oliveira Gomes, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, Ines Oliveira, Tânia Piazentin Conflitos e ambiguidades de papéis no trabalho de juízes: as percepções de juízes portugueses, Revista de Administração Pública 51, no.66 (Dec 2017): 927–946.https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612156373Raymond V. Carman The Judicial Role Orientation, (Mar 2017): 11–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0_2Raymond V. Carman The Development of the Judicial Role Orientation, (Mar 2017): 77–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0_4Raymond V. Carman The Impact of the Judicial Role Orientation, (Mar 2017): 105–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0_5Adalmir Oliveira Gomes, Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, Eda Castro Lucas de Souza Judicial Work and Judges’ Motivation: The Perceptions of Brazilian State Judges, Law & Policy 38, no.22 (Feb 2016): 162–176.https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12050Rachel Dioso-Villa Is the Expert Admissibility Game Fixed?: Judicial Gatekeeping of Fire and Arson Evidence, Law & Policy 38, no.11 (Dec 2015): 54–80.https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12047Andrew Hewitt Smith The Effect of Ideology and Proportionality of the U.S. Courts of Appeals on the Likelihood of Supreme Court Reversal, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2475631Lee Epstein, Tonja Jacobi The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6, no.11 (Dec 2010): 341–358.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152921Rachel Dioso-Villa Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Outcomes and the Legal Rhetoric of Expert Evidence (Doctoral Dissertation), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3010712Kirk A. Randazzo Foreign Affairs Litigation in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Analysis, Justice System Journal 25, no.22 (Dec 2013): 227–238.https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2004.10767719DAVID C. NIXON, J. DAVID HASKIN Judicial Retirement Strategies, American Politics Quarterly 28, no.44 (Oct 2000): 458–489.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X00028004002Lee Epstein, Jack Knight Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, A Look Ahead, Political Research Quarterly 53, no.33 (Sep 2000): 625–661.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300309 Paul R. Brace , and Melinda Gann Hall The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice, The Journal of Politics 59, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1206–1231.https://doi.org/10.2307/2998598Melinda Gann Hall, Paul Brace Justices' Responses To Case Facts, American Politics Quarterly 24, no.22 (Nov 2016): 237–261.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9602400206 William Mishler , and Reginald S. Sheehan Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective, The Journal of Politics 58, no.11 (Oct 2015): 169–200.https://doi.org/10.2307/2960354Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States, Political Research Quarterly 48, no.11 (Mar 1995): 5–29.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800101Paul Brace, and Melinda Gann Hall Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent, The Journal of Politics 55, no.44 (Oct 2015): 914–935.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131942Gary Zuk, Gerard S. Gryski, Deborah J. Barrow Partisan Transformation of the Federal Judiciary, 1869-1992, American Politics Quarterly 21, no.44 (Nov 2016): 439–457.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100403John M. Scheb, Terry Bowen, Gary Anderson Ideology, Role Orientations, and Behavior in the State Courts of Last Resort, American Politics Quarterly 19, no.33 (Nov 2016): 324–335.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9101900304J. M. Scheb, T. D. Ungs, A. L. Hayes Judicial Role Orientations, Attitudes and Decision Making: a Research Note, Political Research Quarterly 42, no.33 (Sep 1989): 427–435.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298904200313Richard L. Pacelle Simulating Supreme Court Decision Making, Political Science Teacher 2, no.22 (Oct 2015): 8–10.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896082800000581Robert E. Drechsel Accountability, Representation and the Communication Behavior of Trial Judges, Western Political Quarterly 40, no.44 (Sep 2016): 685–702.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298704000408TIMOTHY J. O'NEILL The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress?, Law & Policy 9, no.11 (Jan 1987): 97–117.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1987.tb00399.x Frank Way Stability and Change in Constitutional Litigation: The Public Piety Cases, The Journal of Politics 47, no.33 (Oct 2015): 910–925.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131217James L. Gibson From simplicity to complexity: The development of theory in the study of judicial behavior, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 7–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989985 Kenneth C. Haas The Comparative Study of State and Federal Judicial Behavior Revisited, The Journal of Politics 44, no.33 (Oct 2015): 721–746.https://doi.org/10.2307/2130515 John Gruhl Anticipatory Compliance with Supreme Court Rulings, Polity 14, no.22 (Nov 2016): 294–313.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234549JAMES L. GIBSON THE ROLE CONCEPT IN JUDICIAL RESEARCH, Law & Policy 3, no.33 (Jul 1981): 291–311.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1981.tb00248.xC. Neal Tate Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978, American Political Science Review 75, no.22 (Aug 2014): 355–367.https://doi.org/10.2307/1961370Anthony Champagne, Stuart Nagel, Marian Neef Judicial Behavior, (Jan 1981): 241–315.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0579-9_5 John T. Wold and Greg A. Caldeira Perceptions of "Routine" Decision-Making in Five California Courts of Appeal, Polity 13, no.22 (Nov 2016): 334–347.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234588