Abstract

Coupled climate models used for long-term future climate projections and seasonal or decadal predictions share a systematic and persistent warm sea surface temperature (SST) bias in the tropical Atlantic. This study attempts to better understand the physical mechanisms responsible for the development of systematic biases in the tropical Atlantic using the so-called Transpose-CMIP protocol in a multi-model context. Six global climate models have been used to perform seasonal forecasts starting both in May and February over the period 2000–2009. In all models, the growth of SST biases is rapid. Significant biases are seen in the first month of forecast and, by 6 months, the root-mean-square SST bias is 80% of the climatological bias. These control experiments show that the equatorial warm SST bias is not driven by surface heat flux biases in all models, whereas in the south-eastern Atlantic the solar heat flux could explain the setup of an initial warm bias in the first few days. A set of sensitivity experiments with prescribed wind stress confirm the leading role of wind stress biases in driving the equatorial SST bias, even if the amplitude of the SST bias is model dependent. A reduced SST bias leads to a reduced precipitation bias locally, but there is no robust remote effect on West African Monsoon rainfall. Over the south-eastern part of the basin, local wind biases tend to have an impact on the local SST bias (except in the high resolution model). However, there is also a non-local effect of equatorial wind correction in two models. This can be explained by sub-surface advection of water from the equator, which is colder when the bias in equatorial wind stress is corrected. In terms of variability, it is also shown that improving the mean state in the equatorial Atlantic leads to a beneficial intensification of the Bjerknes feedback loop. In conclusion, we show a robust effect of wind stress biases on tropical mean climate and variability in multiple climate models.

Highlights

  • Despite efforts made and progress achieved by the climate modelling community in the last few decades, state-of-theart coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs) still exhibit severe errors in some regions of the world

  • A number of local and remote physical mechanisms have been suggested. These studies point to biases in the atmospheric component of CGCMs being mostly responsible for the initial development of South-Eastern Tropical Atlantic (SETA) errors, which propagate to the ocean component at longer timescales (Toniazzo and Woolnough 2014; Goubanova et al 2018); results from stand-alone ocean simulations reveal that systematic errors in the ocean component significantly contribute to the SETA sea surface temperature (SST) biases (Xu et al 2013; Exarchou et al 2018)

  • This is the so-called “Transpose-CMIP” approach, where coupled atmosphere–ocean climate models are run in weather-forecast mode

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite efforts made and progress achieved by the climate modelling community in the last few decades, state-of-theart coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs) still exhibit severe errors in some regions of the world. A number of local and remote physical mechanisms have been suggested (see the reviews by Richter 2015 and; Zuidema et al 2016) These studies point to biases in the atmospheric component of CGCMs being mostly responsible for the initial development of SETA errors, which propagate to the ocean component at longer timescales (Toniazzo and Woolnough 2014; Goubanova et al 2018); results from stand-alone ocean simulations reveal that systematic errors in the ocean component significantly contribute to the SETA SST biases (Xu et al 2013; Exarchou et al 2018).

Common protocol
Model description and specificities according to the common protocol
Objective
Basin‐wide evolution of biases over the Tropical Atlantic
Analysis of daily data over key regions in the tropical Atlantic
Sub‐surface temperature drift
Sensitivity experiments analysis
Impact of wind stress corrections on SST
Impact of wind stress corrections on subsurface temperature
Impact of wind stress corrections on precipitation
Impact on key regions and time‐scales
Impact on the Bjerknes feedback
Summary
Findings
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.