Abstract

Previous research on feature binding in visual working memory has supported a privileged role for location in binding an object's nonspatial features. However, humans are able to correctly recall feature conjunctions of objects that occupy the same location at different times. In a series of behavioral experiments, we investigated binding errors under these conditions, and specifically tested whether ordinal position can take the role of location in mediating feature binding. We performed two dual report experiments in which participants had to memorize three colored shapes presented sequentially at the screen center. When participants were cued with the ordinal position of one item and had to report its shape and color, report errors for the two features were largely uncorrelated. In contrast, when participants were cued, for example, with an item's shape and reported an incorrect ordinal position, they had a high chance of making a corresponding error in the color report. This pattern of error correlations closely matched the predictions of a model in which color and shape are bound to each other only indirectly via an item's ordinal position. In a third experiment, we directly compared the roles of location and sequential position in feature binding. Participants viewed a sequence of colored disks displayed at different locations and were cued either by a disk's location or its ordinal position to report its remaining properties. The pattern of errors supported a mixed strategy with individual variation, suggesting that binding via either time or space could be used for this task. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Highlights

  • Previous research on feature binding in visual working memory has supported a privileged role for location in binding an object’s non-spatial features

  • Applying a two-way repeated measures ANOVA to the proportion of target responses in the ordinal cue condition, we found no significant effect of report feature (shape or color; F (1, 54) = 0.45, p = 0.52), no significant effect of the target item’s ordinal position (F (2, 54) = 3.03, p = 0.073), and no significant interaction (F (2, 54) = 0.020, p = 0.98)

  • We found strong support for the hypothesis that ordinal position can mediate binding between visual features, in the same manner as has previously been described for spatial location

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous research on feature binding in visual working memory has supported a privileged role for location in binding an object’s non-spatial features. Several more recent studies employed delayed reproduction tasks in a dual-report paradigm to investigate feature binding and the nature of object representations in working memory In this type of task, participants view an array of sample stimuli characterized by multiple features (e.g., colored oriented bars). A cue is presented that identifies the target item from the sample array, and participants have to report two features of that item on a continuous scale (e.g. by adjusting a color, orientation, or location probe) This form of response makes it possible to distinguish between different types of errors, and to detect dependencies between errors in the two responses. Slot models of working memory (Luck & Vogel, 1997) assume that bound object representations comprising all features of a visual stimulus are the natural units of working memory, without any special role for location

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call