Role of therapeutic inertia in glycemic control according to individualized objectives in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Results from CONCARDIA2

Abstract

Background and objectiveTherapeutic inertia (TI) is the lack of initiation or intensification of treatment when indicated. It contributes to the fact that more than a third of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) do not have adequate metabolic control. We set out to analyze the impact of TI during 4 years of follow-up in a cohort of T2D and its possible variables. Materials and methodsProspective cohort study of a cohort of 297 TD2 patients. We considered TI when treatment was not modified during the 4 years, despite poor control. We contemplate uncontrolled those that did not meet their individualized HbA1c target. ResultsUncontrolled patients: 87; age: 62.2 ± 9.2; 58.7% men. We consider TI in 41.6% of the patients. Average HbA1c 8.22% in patients with treatment intensification of which 43.1% achieved their HbA1c goal, 29.8% were on monotherapy at the beginning, 29.8% double, 36.2% triple and 2,1% in quadruple therapy. There was more change in treatment in people with obesity (67.6 vs. 34.6%; P < 0.01) and the 6 of the study patients with cardiovascular events (P < 0.05). Metformin was part of the treatment in 97.1% of IT cases (vs. 76.6%; P < 0.01). Achievement of the HbA1c target was higher in patients receiving iSGLT2 (0 vs. 68.4%; P < 0.001). ConclusionsIn 2 out of 5 uncontrolled T2D patients, the treatment was not changed; this was more evident in those patients treated with metformin. Patients with obesity and presence of cardiovascular events seem to protect against IT. Those who were on iSGLT2 have an advantage in meeting their HbA1c target.