Abstract

The function of retinoic acid (RA) during limb development is still debated, as loss and gain of function studies led to opposite conclusions. With regard to limb initiation, genetic studies demonstrated that activation of FGF10 signaling is required for the emergence of limb buds from the trunk, with Tbx5 and RA signaling acting upstream in the forelimb field, whereas Tbx4 and Pitx1 act upstream in the hindlimb field. Early studies in chick embryos suggested that RA as well as Meis1 and Meis2 (Meis1/2) are required for subsequent proximodistal patterning of both forelimbs and hindlimbs, with RA diffusing from the trunk, functioning to activate Meis1/2 specifically in the proximal limb bud mesoderm. However, genetic loss of RA signaling does not result in loss of limb Meis1/2 expression and limb patterning is normal, although Meis1/2 expression is reduced in trunk somitic mesoderm. More recent studies demonstrated that global genetic loss of Meis1/2 results in a somite defect and failure of limb bud initiation. Other new studies reported that conditional genetic loss of Meis1/2 in the limb results in proximodistal patterning defects, and distal FGF8 signaling represses Meis1/2 to constrain its expression to the proximal limb. In this review, we hypothesize that RA and Meis1/2 both function in the trunk to initiate forelimb bud initiation, but that limb Meis1/2 expression is activated proximally by a factor other than RA and repressed distally by FGF8 to generate proximodistal patterning.

Highlights

  • The function of retinoic acid (RA) during limb development is still debated, as loss and gain of function studies led to opposite conclusions

  • Other new studies reported that conditional genetic loss of Meis1/2 in the limb results in proximodistal patterning defects, and distal FGF8 signaling represses Meis1/2 to constrain its expression to the proximal limb

  • We previously suggested that the most parsimonious model for limb proximodistal patterning is a “one-signal model” that is driven by distal fibroblast growth factor (FGF) that stimulate outgrowth, repress Meis1/2 to generate proximodistal patterning, and activate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Investigation of the mechanisms underlying limb development serves as a paradigm for understanding development in general. Many signaling and transcriptional pathways converge to generate growth and patterning of the limb [1]. During forelimb bud initiation, Tbx is required upstream of FGF10 [5,6,7]. Tbx and Pitx function upstream of FGF10 [9]. Subsequent proximodistal patterning of both forelimbs and hindlimbs was suggested from studies in chick embryos to require proximal-specific expression of Meis and Meis (Meis1/2) as well as RA signaling, which was proposed to activate Meis1/2 expression proximally [10,11,12]. We discuss the mechanisms of limb initiation and proximodistal patterning in the light of recent genetic studies on RA signaling and.

Mechanism
Generation
Function of RA during Forelimb Budding
Loss of Trunk RA Signaling Does Not Affect Hindlimb Bud Initiation
Requirement of Meis Genes for Forelimb Bud Initiation
Chick Studies Support a Two-Signal Model for Limb Proximodistal Patterning
Conclusions and Perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call