Abstract

Background:Breast and lung cancer are two of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in North America. While patients are living longer with advances in treatment and supportive care, some patients are being diagnosed with a second malignancy. The primary objective in this study was to assess the correlation between the development of an ipsilateral lung cancer or breast cancer, and prior radiation therapy. In addition, we sought to report the survival outcomes of patients in these clinical scenarios. Methods: We conducted a single institution (the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre) retrospective review of patients with the diagnoses of both breast and lung cancer treated between 1995 and 2013. Patients were included if they received radiation for a breast primary, and subsequently developed an ipsilateral lung primary, or vice-versa. Data included patient demographics, lifestyle factors, tumor location and subtype, cancer stages, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Results: Of 252 patients included in the study, 217 patients developed a breast primary first, with 35 patients developing a lung primary first. Median disease-free survival from the second primary diagnosis was 36 months in breast primary first patients, and 59 months in the lung primary first cohort. There was no significant correlation between the laterality of radiation treatment and side of second primary based on Fisher’s exact test. Conclusions: Our data reveal no association between side of radiation treatment and subsequent cancer development. The benefits of radiotherapy outweigh the risk of radiation-induced primaries. Longer term studies with matched patient cohorts are required to further assess treatment and lifestyle factors that may contribute towards the development of second malignancies.

Highlights

  • Lung cancer and breast cancer are two of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in North America and rank first and second among cancer-related deaths respectively

  • Median follow-up was longer for the breast primary first (BPF) group compared to the lung primary first (LPF) cohort (82 months [BPF] vs. 58 months [LPF]) while the median survival was greater for the LPF group (40 months [LPF] vs. 17 months [BPF])

  • This study showed no significant association between laterality of radiation treatment and subsequent lung cancer or breast cancer development, as well as no appreciable differences in age, stage, lung tumor subtypes, smoking history, treatment modalities, or cancer-related mortality based on side of irradiation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lung cancer and breast cancer are two of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in North America and rank first and second among cancer-related deaths respectively. There have been several studies that reported an increased risk of second primary cancers in patients with an initial diagnosis of breast cancer [1]-[6]. The increased propensity to develop a second primary malignancy has been thought to be related to common genetic, hormonal, or environmental risk factors. Smoking is the most significant risk factor associated with the development of primary lung cancer. The primary objective in this study was to assess the correlation between the development of an ipsilateral lung cancer or breast cancer, and prior radiation therapy. Lifestyle factors, tumor location and subtype, cancer stages, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Longer term studies with matched patient cohorts are required to further assess treatment and lifestyle factors that may contribute towards the development of second malignancies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.