Abstract
BackgroundIn locally advanced rectal cancer, many imaging modalities are used, for example 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and MRI. The aim of our study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT & pelvic MRI; as well as to investigate the possible added value of using combined pelvic MRI and PET-CT for assessment of tumor response.ResultsRegarding the presence of local tumor, both PET CT and MRI showed perfect agreement with 97.1% overall accuracy, while in N category, PET CT showed higher specificity but lower sensitivity than MRI. MRI was superior to PET/CT in detecting extension to nearby organs; owing to the more anatomical details of MRI regarding the involvement of mesorectal fascia and EMVI. Almost total agreement of both MRI and PET/CT was noticed in evaluating post-therapy and postoperative complications.ConclusionFor locally advanced rectal cancer (pT3–4 N0 M0 or any T N1 M0), a multimodality strategy has been shown to be the best option to evaluate local disease process, using the diagnostic criteria that were based on morphology, as well as glucose uptake, instead of the SUV alone for reassessment of post-therapy or postoperative changes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
