Abstract

Abstract aimTo assess role of MDCT in diagnostic evaluation of different renal sinus lesions. MethodsA prospective study included 40 patients (25 male; 5 female; mean age, ±SD, 54 ± 8 years) proven as renal sinus lesions by US& 64-MDCT. MDCT protocoal included unenhanced and contrast enhanced MDCT (CMP & NP & EP). Comparing MDCT findings with histopathological results were calculated. The study was approved by ethics committee. ResultsOur different pathology were: −3 parapelvic cysts (0.4%); 2 peripelvic cysts (0.8%); 3R.A.A. (1.2%); 1 AVM (0.4%); 2 lipomatosis (0.8%), 2XGP (0.8%); 2 hematomas (0.8%); 1 abscess (0.4%); 2 SCC (0.4%); 7 TCC (2.8%); 1 AML (0.4%); 1 hemangioma (0.4%); 2 AML (0.8%); 1 NHL (04%); 1CPDN (0.4%),1 MCN (0.4%), 6 RCC (2.4%); 1 retroperitoneal NHL (0.4%), 1 retroperitoneal plasmacytoma (0.4%). Statistically significant difference was found between HU in CMP and EP (P < 0.001) and between NP & EP (P < 0.001) in cases of RCC, A significant statistical difference was detected among HU in NP and EP in TCC (P value = 0.03). Presence of pseudo-capsule in RCC (P < 0.001), MDCT yields sensitivity 95%, specificity 70%, PPV = 90.2% & NPV = 77.8% and overall accuracy 87.5%. ConclusionMDCT accurately evaluated different renal sinus lesions and differentiating between benign and malignant lesions as well as clear cell subtype and unclassified subtype of RCC.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.