Abstract
Objectives. To evaluate the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in renal transplant recipients whose ultrasound (US) examinations of the native kidneys have met the criteria of acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD). Methods. The US scans of 840 renal allograft recipients were prospectively studied. In addition, 46 of 169 patients diagnosed with ACKD by US scans underwent MR examination. MRI protocols included (a) T1 and T2-weighted fast spin echo imaging, (b) T2-weighted gradient echo imaging, and (c) gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging in 7 patients with evidence of complex cysts. In the case of complex lesions, both US and MRI follow-up examinations were performed between 6 and 12 months after the prior examination. Results. US examination showed ACKD in 169 of 840 patients. In addition, US revealed 8 patients with renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Of these 8 patients, 7 had evidence of ACKD. The median number of cysts depicted on US examination in native kidneys of renal transplant recipients was 3 (range 0 to 10) on both sides. MRI revealed significantly more and smaller cysts compared to US. The median number of cysts was seven on the left and nine on the right native kidneys, respectively. MRI revealed 18 complex lesions in 7 patients. Thirteen of 18 complex lesions were undetected by US. Conclusions. MRI is superior to US in depiction of simple and complex lesions of native kidneys in renal allograft recipients. MRI exhibits no overestimation of the prevalence of ACKD on the basis of the US criteria already mentioned. Advantages of MRI do not justify routine screening tests by this imaging modality. However, MRI should be used for further evaluation of complex lesions detected by US.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.