Abstract
This paper explores the roles innovation intermediaries play in stimulating triple helix networks in Thai SMEs. Typically, knowledge networks can be classified into three forms: vertical value chain; horizontal/industrial chain; and diagonal/triple helix networks. The first two inter-firm networks evolve into triple helix network upon policy intervention via intermediaries. Intermediaries play sponsoring role at policy level by channeling resources to industry; brokering role at strategic level by linking triple helix actors; and boundary spanning role at operational level by providing services that facilitate knowledge circulation. Data were collected from the ceramic and furniture industries to test the significance of the ways the triple helix process is intermediated. The sponsoring role of intermediaries is found to be crucial for promoting the development of triple helix network in the case of these industries. The experiences of the two cases further suggest that market-led intermediaries would be more effective in promoting triple helix network development than government-funded intermediaries.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
