Role of genetic ancestry in endometrial cancers: Understanding disparities in black women.

Abstract

e17631 Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in the United States. Endometrial cancer disproportionately affects black women in terms of incidence and survival despite advancement in treatment, and preventive strategies. Identifying distinct tumor markers in patients with African ancestry will help distinguish biological determinants underlying the disparities in endometrial cancer. In this study, we investigated the genetic alterations in endometrial cancer in individuals of African (AFR) ancestry using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Methods: The genomic and clinical data of TCGA PanCancer Atlas uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) were explored using CBioportal (http://www.cbioportal.org/). We utilized The Cancer Genome Ancestry Atlas (TCGAA) and LAMP for estimates of genetic ancestry and quantitative ancestral composition. This dataset contains 529 patients, including 357 self-reported whites and 107 blacks. For each case the proportion of European, West African, East Asian, Native American ancestry was estimated. The dominant ancestry was defined as ≥50% of admixture from one reference population. Differences in gene mutation frequency were analyzed based on AFR ancestry proportion. The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: Global genetic ancestry analysis identified 115 AFR ancestry cases with mean ancestry of 80.4%. The dominant AFR ancestry subject matched the self-reported race with 94% accuracy. We identified 23 subjects with ≥90% AFR ancestry, 43 subjects with 80-90% AFR ancestry, 34 subjects with 70-80% AFR ancestry, and 15 subjects with 50-70% AFR ancestry. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene in patients with AFR ancestry(49.5%). ≥90% AFR ancestry had the highest rate of TP53 mutations (52.2%) compared with 80-90% AFR ancestry (51.2%), 70-80% AFR ancestry (43.8%), and 50-70% AFR ancestry (41.7%). PTEN was less commonly mutated in patients with higher proportion of AFR ancestry (47.8% in ≥90% AFR ancestry, 39.0% in 80-90% AFR ancestry, 59.4% in 70-80% AFR ancestry, and 66.7% in 50-70% AFR ancestry). PIK3CA mutation frequency was almost identical in all AFR ancestry groups studied. No significant differences in overall survival was observed between AFR ancestry groups. Conclusions: We aimed to investigate the etiology of endometrial cancer disparities by analyzing the effect of ancestry on genetic alterations in endometrial cancer. This study demonstrated differences in the mutation frequency among patients with AFR ancestry. We have shown that TP53 mutations were seen more frequently in patients with higher AFR ancestry, which may confer a poorer prognosis. Nonetheless, to validate the findings of this study, future studies should be conducted with larger sample sizes and more diverse ancestral groups to explore how genetic ancestry impacts tumorigenesis and cancer progression.