Abstract

The aim is to give an overview of available literature data on the role of feed processing on gut health and function with specific focus on particle size and hydrothermal processing. In addition, influence of feed processing on efficacy of exogenous feed enzymes will be discussed. The current feed processing technologies are such that ingredient choices and diet form are refined to improve feed intake and nutrient utilization efficiency. Finer feed particle size enables optimal nutrient utilization and enhances animal performance due to increased surface area allowing better contact with digestive enzymes. Moreover, adequate diminution of feed ingredients is beneficial to feed manufacturing processes such as mixing and hydrothermal treatments including pelleting, extrusion, and expansion. However, emerging trends in consumer and regulatory demands for restriction or cessation of animal production practices such as use of antimicrobial growth promoters are challenging current approaches to feed processing. There is limit as to the fineness of the particle size, as very fine particles negatively affect gut health due to higher incidences of stomach ulceration in pigs and gizzard dysfunction in poultry. Coarse particle size increases stomach and hindgut acidification which may be beneficial in controlling proliferation of enteric pathogens such as salmonella and E. coli. Optimal particle size could be designed in the grinding process using roller or hammer mill. However, since most commercial pigs and poultry diets are subjected to hydrothermal processes, additional reduction of feed particle size is inevitable. The need to achieve high physical quality and to reduce potential levels of feed-borne pathogens such as Salmonella has led to the application of relatively high conditioning temperatures during conventional hydrothermal processes, a practice that does not favor high nutrient utilization and stability of heat sensitive feed additives such as feed enzymes. Therefore, with evolving pig and poultry production practices, the regimens for feed processing will no longer be appreciated only in terms of optimizing nutrients utilization, but also in terms of impact on feed hygienic status, efficacy of feed additives, animal health, and food safety.

Highlights

  • FEED PROCESSINGAdvances in genetics has certainly produced commercial strains of poultry and pig with greater performance with minimal feed input

  • The necessity to achieve and sustain genetic potential has been the driving force behind continuous advances in nutrition concepts seen in modern day commercial pig and poultry enterprises

  • The intention of this chapter is to provide a critical overview of feed processing with emphasis on particle size and hydrothermal processing (HTP) in the context of gut health and function

Read more

Summary

FEED PROCESSING

Advances in genetics has certainly produced commercial strains of poultry and pig with greater performance (growth, reproduction etc.) with minimal feed input. The necessity to achieve and sustain genetic potential has been the driving force behind continuous advances in nutrition concepts seen in modern day commercial pig and poultry enterprises In this context, feeding, a major control point of profitability has evolved and progressed both in terms of understanding digestive physiology and metabolism, and in the more precise evaluation of the quality of dietary raw materials. Many advantages that can be attributed to feed processing includes improved availability of nutrients, destruction of inhibitors and toxins, facilitation of the use of a wide range of raw materials in diet formulations, production of hygienic feed, and reduction of feed wastage [21, 23] It is well-recognized that processing parameters such as extent of particle modification, processing temperature, pressure, duration, and water determine the physical and chemical reactions in and between nutrients as well as the adhesive properties on the feed particle surfaces, the final physicochemical structure and the hygiene status of the feed [22, 24]. Subsequent sections will focus on the impact of particle size and HTP on gut health and function

PARTICLE SIZE
IMPACT OF PARTICLE SIZE ON GUT
IMPACT ON GUT MICROBIAL ACTIVITY
HYDROTHERMAL PROCESSING
Impact on Feed Microbial Load
Impact on Gut Physiology
APPETITE CONTROL AND
Impact on Microbial Activity
EXOGENOUS FEED ENZYMES
OPTIMAL FEED PROCESSING
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call