Abstract

We analyze earthquake ruptures propagating along a straight “main” fault and encountering a finite‐length branch fault. Such intersections are often observed in natural fault systems. The predicted effects of the interaction with the branch that we report can be remarkable; they can strongly perturb the propagation velocity on the main fault and, in some cases, even arrest that propagation. Earlier work (Kame et al., 2003; Bhat et al., 2004) emphasized the role of the fault pre‐stress state, branch geometry (i.e., branching angle), and the incoming rupture velocity at the branching junction in determining whether the rupture would follow the branch or continue on the main fault or both, through simulations which did not let a rupture on the branch encounter a barrier or a fault end (called ‘infinite’ branch cases henceforth). In this study we look at “finite” branch cases, and study the effect also of branch length, with rupture being blocked from propagation beyond the branch end. It is known that sudden stoppage of a dynamic rupture front leads to the propagation of large dynamic stress perturbations in the medium. These have been known to nucleate or terminate ruptures on adjacent fault segments (Harris et al., 1991; Harris and Day, 1993, 1999; Harris et al., 2002; Fliss et al., 2005, among others). We thus anticipate interaction between the rupture on the main fault and the branched one at two stages, when the rupture is propagating on the branch and when it is suddenly blocked at the branch end. We show that in general rupture termination on a compressional branch little affects propagation on the main fault compared to the infinite branch cases. For branches on the extensional side, we show in some cases, that whereas an infinite' branch would have allowed (or stopped) rupture propagation on the main fault, a finite branch stops (or allows) propagation on the main fault. Such results have a dependence on branch length that we document. We also illustrate branch‐related complexities in rupture velocity evolution which could be one of the sources of the high‐frequency content of strong ground motion record. Complexities in the slip distribution, often associated with a presumed heterogeneous strength distribution along the fault, can also be observed when rupture is terminated on a branch.

Highlights

  • [2] Large earthquake events are complex processes

  • For the above case, when vr = 0.80cs, we studied the precise sensitivity of rupture to branch length and noticed that only when the branch is extremely short, Lbr = 1R0, rupture continues to propagate on the main fault

  • [66] We have studied the effect of fault branches on dynamic rupture propagation characteristics along a main fault

Read more

Summary

Introduction

[2] Large earthquake events are complex processes. These complexities show up in the form of short bursts of high-frequency ground motion, branches and offsets in the rupture path, and asymmetry in the inferred slip pattern, to name a few. The other important question of how an earthquake stops is often [3] A fault system has in general geometric complexities, long known to geologists [King and Nabelek, 1985; Sibson, 1985, 1986; King, 1986; Wesnousky, 1988; Knuepfer, 1989; Aydin and Schultz, 1990; Yule and Sieh, 2003; Brankman and Aydin, 2004; Wesnousky, 2006, among others], like bends, branches, step-overs, and sub-parallel strands at different length scales (e.g., 1992 Landers earthquake, Figure 1) The interaction between these geometric complexities and rupture has been observed for various earthquakes. We assume that the slip along the fault is purely tangential and do not allow any opening

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call