Abstract

We used the Potsdam-Allahabad Hindi eye-tracking corpus to investigate the role of wordlevel and sentence-level factors during sentence comprehension in Hindi. Extending previous work that used this eye-tracking data, we investigate the role of surprisal and retrieval cost metrics during sentence processing. While controlling for word-level predictors (word complexity, syllable length, unigram and bigram frequencies) as well as sentence-level predictors such as integration and storage costs, we find a significant effect of surprisal on first-pass reading times (higher surprisal value leads to increase in FPRT). Effect of retrieval cost was only found for a higher degree of parser parallelism. Interestingly, while surprisal has a significant effect on FPRT, storage cost (another predictionbased metric) does not. A significant effect of storage cost shows up only in total fixation time (TFT), thus indicating that these two measures perhaps capture different aspects of prediction. The study replicates previous findings that both prediction-based and memorybased metrics are required to account for processing patterns during sentence comprehension. The results also show that parser model assumptions are critical in order to draw generalizations about the utility of a metric (e.g. surprisal) across various phenomena in a language.

Highlights

  • Eye movements have been successfully employed to uncover cognitive processes that subserve naturalistic reading

  • All data points recorded with 0 ms for these fixation measure were removed, and the data analysis was done on log-transformed reading times to achieve approximate normality of residuals

  • We found a significant effect of surprisal;4 increase in surprisal value leads to increase in the reading time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eye movements have been successfully employed to uncover cognitive processes that subserve naturalistic reading. Researchers who have been studying eye movements have been able to give us very precise models of eye movements along with establishing the link between. Received November 3, 2016; Published April 4, 2017 Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(2): .

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call