Role of exercise stress testing in healthy subjects and patients with coronary heart disease: Controversies in cardiology—I

Abstract

The value of the exercise stress test in the evaluation of clinically healthy subjects and patients with coronary heart disease is not limited to the isolated interpretation of abnormalities of the S-T segment. Other measurable parameters which are of diagnostic and prognostic importance include: (1) a decrease in systolic blood pressure during exercise; (2) the appearance of complex ventricular arrhythmias at low exercise heart rates; (3) the appearance of inverted U waves during or after exercise; (4) the patient's maximal exercise capacity; and (5) new auscultatory findings postexercise. The reliability of the exercise test as a diagnostic tool is further enhanced by proper patient selection and careful attention to exercise techniques. Subjects with labile ST-T wave changes during standing hyperventilation, fixed ST-T changes at rest, and intraventricular conduction defects are not ideal candidates for “diagnostic” stress testing and the examining physician must rely more heavily on nonelectrocardiographic findings. The criteria used to define an abnormal S-T response will vary according to the lead system used. However, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects the appearance of marked degrees of S-T depression at low exercise heart rates significantly increases the probability of finding advanced coronary disease, particularly if the S-T depression is seen in multiple monitoring leads and is of prolonged duration postexercise.