Abstract
Sunlight photoionises atoms and molecules in the Earth’s upper atmosphere, producing ions and photoelectrons. The photoelectrons then produce further ionisation by electron impact. These processes produce the ionosphere, which contains various positive ions, such as NO+, N+, and O+, and an equal density of free electrons. O+(4S) ions are long‐lived and so the electron density is determined mainly by the density of O+(4S). This density is dependent on ambipolar diffusion and on loss processes, which are principally reactions with O2 and N2. The reaction with N2 is known to be strongly dependent on the vibrational state of N2 but the rate constants are not well determined for the ionosphere. Vibrational excitation of N2 is produced by direct excitation by thermal electrons and photoelectrons and by cascade from the excited states of N2 that are produced by photoelectron impact. It can also be produced by a chemical reaction and by vibrational‐translational transitions. The vibrational excitation is lost by deexcitation by electron impact, by step‐wise quenching in collisions with O atoms, and in the reaction with O+(4S). The distribution of vibrational levels is rearranged by vibrational‐vibrational transitions, and by molecular diffusion vertically in the atmosphere. A computational model that includes these processes and predicts the electron density as a function of height in the ionosphere is described. This model is a combination of a “statistical equilibrium” calculation, which is used to predict the populations of the excited states of N2, and a time‐step calculation of the atmospheric reactions and processes. The latter includes a calculation of photoionisation down through the atmosphere as a function of time of day and solar activity, and calculations at 0.1 s intervals of the changing densities of positive ions, electrons and N2 in the different vibrational levels. The validity of the model is tested by comparison of the predicted electron densities with the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) of electron density measurements. The contribution of various input parameters can be investigated by their effect on the accuracy of the calculated electron densities. Here the effects of two different sets of rate constants for the reaction of vibrationally excited N2 with O+(4S) are investigated. For reference, predictions using the different sets are compared with laboratory measurements. Then the effect of using the different sets in the computational model of the ionosphere is investigated. It is shown that one set gives predictions of electron densities that are in reasonable agreement with the IRI, while the other set does not. Both sets result in underestimation of the electron density at the height of the peak electron density in the atmosphere, suggesting that either the amount of vibrational excitation or the rate constants may be overestimated. Our comparison is made for two cases with different conditions, to give an indication of the limitations of the atmospheric modeling and also insight into ways in which the sets of rate constants may be deficient.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.