Role of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 in the non‐canonical mechanism of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus translation initiation

Abstract

Plant viruses are a world‐wide threat both economically and to the food supply. Many of these are positive‐strand RNA viruses that have developed a myriad of non‐canonical translation initiation mechanisms. These unique mechanisms circumvent cap‐dependent translational controls and enable the viruses to outcompete host cell mRNA for the translation machinery. Many RNA viruses lack the canonical 5′ 7‐methylguanosine cap in their mRNAs, thereby allowing them to bypass canonical translation initiation. Instead, these mRNAs utilize structures in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of their mRNA known as a 3′ CITE (cap‐independent translation element) to drive non‐canonical translation initiation. Recently, we have shown that a 3′ CITE in Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV), termed the 3′ BTE (BYDV 3′ CITE), can bind eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4G, eIF4A, and ATP‐bound eIF4B in order to recruit the 40S ribosomal subunit and form a pre‐initiation complex (PIC) at the 3′ BTE. These eIFs cannot directly recruit the 40S subunit to the 5′ UTR of BYDV, but must instead transfer the 40S subunits to the 5′ end of the mRNA scanning, AUG detection, and translation elongation to proceed. This transfer process is aided by a long‐distance, ‘kissing‐loop’, base pairing interaction between stem‐loops in the 5′ and 3′ ends of BYDV. This kissing loop interaction is relatively weak, leading to the hypothesis that additional factors are required to create a stable 5′–3′ interaction capable of efficiently transferring the PIC. Data from pulldown experiments have shown that, in addition to eIF4G, almost every subunit of eIF3 is bound to the BTE. Single‐molecule fluorescence co‐localization experiments have shown that eIF3 specifically and significantly enhanced binding of 40S subunits to the BTE. Moreover, fluorescence anisotropy‐based binding studies have shown that eIF3 binds directly to both the BTE and the 5′ UTR of BYDV, that the BTE and 5′ UTR do not compete for binding to eIF3, and that the presence of the 40S subunit increases the affinity with which eIF3 binds to the BTE and 5′ UTR. Collectively, these data suggest that eIF3, the 40S subunit, the 3′ BTE, and the 5′ UTR are components of a single macromolecular complex. Based on this interpretation of our data, we propose that eIF3 bridges the 3′ and 5′ ends of BYDV and aids the kissing loop interaction in transferring the PIC from the 3′ to the 5′ end of BYDV.Support or Funding InformationGrant Support: NSF MCB‐1513737 (to DJG), NSF‐IGERT Fellowship 0965983 (to PP), and NIH GM 084288 (to RLG).This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.