Abstract
In this paper I question a number of assumptions often made within mainstream sociology about time, the nature of society and about methodology. The first is that quantitative methods and especially statistically based analyses are always more scientific and/or reliable bases for action than well-researched and argued (in a literal sense) qualitative judgements collectively made in situ.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
