Abstract

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors, their number is increasing with advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Even small lesions that are difficult to detect using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can now be detected with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Contrast-enhanced EUS is useful, and not only diagnosis but also malignancy detection has become possible by evaluating the vascularity of tumors. Pathological diagnosis using EUS with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful when diagnostic imaging is difficult. EUS-FNA can also be used to evaluate the grade of malignancy. Pooling the data of the studies that compared the PNENs grading between EUS-FNA samples and surgical specimens showed a concordance rate of 77.5% (κ-statistic = 0.65, 95% confidence interval = 0.59–0.71, p < 0.01). Stratified analysis for small tumor size (2 cm) showed that the concordance rate was 84.5% and the kappa correlation index was 0.59 (95% confidence interval = 0.43–0.74, p < 0.01). The evolution of ultrasound imaging technologies such as contrast-enhanced and elastography and the artificial intelligence that analyzes them, the evolution of needles, and genetic analysis, will further develop the diagnosis and treatment of PNENs in the future.

Highlights

  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors that account for 2–3% of all pancreatic tumors

  • Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has a superior sensitivity for detecting PNENs compared with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

  • We review the current literature regarding the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis of PNENs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors that account for 2–3% of all pancreatic tumors. The number of reported cases has been increasing, mainly because of the advances in various diagnostic imaging modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has a superior sensitivity for detecting PNENs compared with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). When performed by experienced hands, EUS can detect focal lesions as small as 2–5 mm [1]. Tissue acquisition using EUS with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is essential for the diagnostic and treatment decisions. We review the current literature regarding the role of EUS in the diagnosis of PNENs. Since this study focuses on diagnosis, it does not include interventional EUS, such as EUS-ablation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call