Abstract

BackgroundThe optimal management of cervical lymph nodes in N0M0 maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MSSCC) remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to investigate the impact of elective neck dissection (END) on the prognosis of N0M0 MSSCC patients and explore potential prognostic factors. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize bias between the END and non-END groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on patient characteristics. Furthermore, the optimal number of lymph nodes in END was determined using maximally selected test statistics. ResultsA total of 777 N0M0 MSSCC patients were included in the study. After PSM, patients who underwent END demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not undergo END (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed a favorable prognosis for patients receiving radiotherapy and END, with a hazard ratio of 0.729 (95% CI: 0.549–0.967; p = 0.029) for OS. Furthermore, patients with a lymph node count greater than 5 in END had significantly better OS and CSS compared to those with 5 or fewer lymph nodes (p = 0.013, p = 0.018, respectively). ConclusionOur findings suggest that END provides a survival benefit for N0M0 MSSCC patients. Additionally, a lymph node count greater than 5 in END is associated with improved staging accuracy and better prognosis. Prospective research is needed to validate these findings and inform clinical decision-making for N0M0 MSSCC patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.