Abstract

Many animals display morphological adaptations of the nose that improve their ability to detect and track odors. Bilateral odor sampling improves an animals’ ability to navigate using olfaction and increased separation of the nostrils facilitates olfactory source localization. Many bats use odors to find food and mates and bats display an elaborate diversity of facial features. Prior studies have quantified how variations in facial features correlate with echolocation and feeding ecology, but surprisingly none have asked whether bat noses might be adapted for olfactory tracking in flight. We predicted that bat species that rely upon odor cues while foraging would have greater nostril separation in support of olfactory tropotaxis. Using museum specimens, we measured the external nose and cranial morphology of 40 New World bat species. Diet had a significant effect on external nose morphology, but contrary to our predictions, insectivorous bats had the largest relative separation of nostrils, while nectar feeding species had the narrowest nostril widths. Furthermore, nasal echolocating bats had significantly narrower nostrils than oral emitting bats, reflecting a potential trade-off between sonar pulse emission and stereo-olfaction in those species. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the evolutionary interactions between olfaction and echolocation in shaping the external morphology of a facial feature using modern phylogenetic comparative methods. Future work pairing olfactory morphology with tracking behavior will provide more insight into how animals such as bats integrate olfactory information while foraging.

Highlights

  • Animals rely on chemical signals to detect, identify, discriminate, and localize the resources critical for their survival and fitness, including food, shelter, and mates

  • In this study we evaluate if there is a relationship between external nasal morphology and foraging ecology among bats

  • Nose morphology and olfactory tracking in bats limited post-cranial mobility or those moving at fast speeds in three-dimensional environments [4,31,32]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals rely on chemical signals to detect, identify, discriminate, and localize the resources critical for their survival and fitness, including food, shelter, and mates. Olfactory klinotaxis (or true gradient search) is movement through an olfactory gradient with successive sampling at different locations [2] To be effective, this strategy requires close proximity to the odor source, since at farther distances turbulence and advection begin to create patchier distributions of odor concentrations. Animals can use tropotactic mechanisms to orient towards an odor based on concentration gradient [3] or time of odor arrival [4] Bilateral processing of odors (stereo-olfaction) is crucial in the olfactory localization behavior of a wide range of taxa, including insects [5,6], mollusks [7,8], crustaceans [9], fish [4], and mammals [10,11,12,13]. Stereo-olfaction has been shown to play a role in odor localization and tracking in moles [10] and humans [13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call