Abstract

Background: The role of early neuroimaging in older vasculopathic patients presenting with acute isolated ocular motor nerve palsy is still being debated. We wanted to demonstrate the approach differences between neurologists and ophthalmologists, and examine the role of early neuroimaging in managing acute ocular motor mononeuropathies. Methods: Retrospective chart review. Patients ≥ 50 years with vasculopathic risk factors, presenting with acute isolated third, fourth or sixth cranial nerve palsies. We compared the rate of early neuroimaging referral between neurologists and ophthalmologists at initial presentation, and assessed the proportion of cases in which the final diagnosis has changed after early neuroimaging, in a single medical center. Results: 54 patients were included. After excluding patients with third nerve palsy, the rate of patients referred to early neuroimaging was significantly greater when initially presented to a neurologist compared with an ophthalmologist (29/38 patients were referred to early neuroimaging, of whom twenty by a neurologist and nine by an ophthalmologist, p<0.001). Out of 38 patients presented with fourth or sixth nerve palsies, only 4/38 (10%) were found to have a cause other than presumed microvascular ischemia, and only 2/29 (7%) patients referred to neuroimaging were found to have a causative lesion. Conclusions: The decision to perform early neuroimaging in older patients with acute isolated 4th or 6th nerve palsies and vasculopathic risk factors could be weighed against observation alone. Thorough history taking and prudent physical examination are important for identifying patients with greater risks, therefore needing early neuroimaging.

Highlights

  • Isolated third, fourth and sixth cranial nerve palsies are caused by various etiologies

  • Neuroimaging is generally considered necessary in all individuals presenting with third nerve palsies, the role of early neuroimaging in older individuals with vasculopathic risk factors presenting with acute isolated 4th or 6th nerve palsy is still under debate and there is a lack of consensus between different medical specialties

  • Patients included in the study had at least one vasculopathic risk factor, because the population under debate regarding the role of early neuroimaging in acute isolated 4th or 6th nerve palsy is older individuals with vasculopathic risk factors, and patients with no vasculopathic risk factors were excluded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fourth and sixth cranial nerve palsies are caused by various etiologies. Neuroimaging is generally considered necessary in all individuals presenting with third nerve palsies, the role of early neuroimaging in older individuals (age ≥ 50 years) with vasculopathic risk factors presenting with acute isolated 4th or 6th nerve palsy is still under debate and there is a lack of consensus between different medical specialties. The role of early neuroimaging in older vasculopathic patients presenting with acute isolated ocular motor nerve palsy is still being debated. Patients ≥ 50 years with vasculopathic risk factors, presenting with acute isolated third, fourth or sixth cranial nerve palsies. Conclusions: The decision to perform early neuroimaging in older patients with acute isolated 4th or 6th nerve palsies and vasculopathic risk factors could be weighed against observation alone. Thorough history taking and prudent physical examination are important for identifying patients with greater risks, needing early neuroimaging

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call