Abstract
Three experiments were carried out to investigate the importance of dynamic cues in monaural and binaural detection tasks. All experiments employed a two-interval forced-choice procedure, in which the signal, a 500-Hz tone, 128 msec in duration, was added to the masker prior to gating in one of the two intervals. Both monaural (signal and masker diotic: M0–S0) and binaural (diotic masker, signal phase-reversed in one ear relative to the other: M0–Sπ) conditions were investigated. The masker (70 dB SPL) was either a tone of 500 Hz (Experiment 1), a 500-Hz carrier tone modulated by a 50-Hz tone (Experiment 2), or a 500-Hz carrier tone modulated by a band-pass noise centered at 60 Hz (Experiment 3). The angle of addition of the signal to the masker (α) was either 0°, 45°, 90° or 135°. In general, for all values of α, S0 thresholds increased from Experiment 1 to Experiment 3, indicating that monaural signal detection is more difficult in a dynamic than in a static environment. Sπ thresholds did not change significantly from Experiment 1 to Experiment 2, thus giving no support to the notion that detection of regularly varying interaural cues (at a modulation frequency of 50 Hz) is easier than detection of static cues. However, Sπ thresholds in Experiment 3 were slightly higher than in Experiment 2, indicating that detection of randomly fluctuating interaural cues is more difficult than detection of regularly fluctuating cues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.