Role of detached podocytes in differentiating between minimal change disease and early focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, can we rely on routine light microscopy?

Abstract

BackgroundDetachment of podocytes represents a turning point in the development of glomerular sclerosis and consequently, of CKD progression. Furthermore, detachment may differentiate minimal change disease (MCD) cases—which have only podocyte effacement—from early focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in which effacement and detachment are observed by electron microscopy. Noteworthy, it is not uncommon for early FSGS to present with clinical presentation and light microscopy (LM) pictures identical to MCD. In our routine practice, we often find cells that lie freely in Bowman’s space by LM. In this study, we try to determine whether these cells are detached podocytes that are worth reporting or just an artifact that can be ignored.MethodsTo the best of our knowledge, no study has discussed the accuracy of LM in detecting detached podocytes by the routinely used stains. We retrospectively selected 118 cases that were diagnosed as MCD by LM, and searched for detached cells in Bowman’s space in their archived, routinely stained LM slides. After that, we tried to find any correlation between the clinical course, detached cells in LM picture and the EM reports. ResultsLM can significantly detect detached podocytes with a positive predictive value of 93%, specificity of 85%, and sensitivity of 46%. Significant correlations were found between detached cells and degree of proteinuria and late steroid resistance.Conclusion Detecting detached podocytes by LM is a specific finding that must be reported whenever detected, as it predicts response to steroids and may be able to differentiate MCD from early FSGS by identifying patients who could have podocytopenia.